Skip to content

Messianic friend: “Belief in Yeshua is 100% experiential”

June 1, 2015

worship-jesusBelow is the recent response from my long-time messianic friend (ethnic Jew, involved in the MJ movement, intermarried, with his non-Jewish children married to Gentile Christian pastors and heavily involved in Evangelical ministries) to being challenged to think about his ongoing sin of idolatry of Jesus-worship. This is the same friend who told me over our dinner-meeting late last year (which he mentions below): “I don’t care what the Bible says, Jesus revealed himself to me.” The theme of his response is that all true believers know that Jesus is true because they feel his presence, and not because he can be proven or shown from the Jewish scriptures (or even from the New Testament) to be either god, messiah or both. To my Christian, ethnically Jewish friend his god Jesus can only be felt and experienced on a personal basis, supernaturally – the proof of Jesus comes from “inner knowing”. He says that since I left Jesus, I must have never known him and “Yeshua never came into” me. According to my messianic friend, it’s futile to look to the Hebrew Bible for evidence of Jesus within its pages (and indeed, my friend refused to do so), for to do so would constitute intellectual “fleshly” attempts to experience what could only be felt in one’s soul. How can one be proved that something they believe is actually false, when one can “feel” Jesus and “see” what he has “done” for his worshipers? True believers in Jesus need no proof that he is god and that he’s real, and not even the Bible can persuade them otherwise. Read more…

Can one convert to Judaism while still worshiping Jesus?

May 28, 2015

MikvahWe live in strange days, folks. Various “messianic” Christian groups, from Bible-belt “Hebrew Roots” to the so called “mainstream messianics” (composed of ethnically-Jewish converts to Evangelical Christianity), now offer their fellow Christians a chance to become “Messianic Jews” through conversion, without compromising their Christian conscience. This means that no changes to the core Christian beliefs that Jews find idolatrous and foreign to Judaism (such as Trinity and deity of Jesus) are required. The chief prerequisite for a “convert” is a “calling” to be part of the Jewish people.

Here are five reasons why all such “conversions” are an oxymoron, nonsensical, deceptive and an utterly futile waste of time:
Read more…

Update and a few thoughts

May 19, 2015

Dear Daily Minyan readers, I have not posted in quite a bit, chiefly because I was very busy with life and work lately. I will attempt to resume regularly scheduled posts. In the meantime, here are some thoughts that have accumulated.

1. I have started preparations to make aliyah (immigrate) to Israel within a year, G-d willing. Lots of details still need to be worked out. I have also started studying Hebrew in earnest; thankfully, learning a new language is something I have quite a bit of experience with, so I know what it takes to get there – a lot of work. My kids are still very young (and we have one more on the way), so I am also thinking that this would be an opportune time to bring my family to the Land. I do have quite a bit of family already living in Israel, both close and more distant, as well as many family friends, and have visited them in the past a number of times. That said, as someone who had already immigrated from one country to another, I am fully aware of the great difficulties that come with uprooting oneself and starting from scratch. I left USSR for the United States, the land of freedom and prosperity, so then we knew that we would be upgrading our material well-being. Coming to Israel, however, I fully expect our material well-being to be downgraded. However, growing up in the former Soviet Union, I know what it’s like to live with less, much less, so I have no problem with that. More importantly, I know that the spiritual benefits of living in Eretz Yisrael with my family can’t be matched by living anywhere else. P.S. If you are one of my readers who lives in Israel, you are welcome to send me an email about my plans.

2. I have recently contemplated on what’s going on in the messianic blogosphere as of late. Virtually no ethnically Jewish messianics are actively involved online, except a few old folks commenting on blogs written by Gentile messianics. I have also come to realize the following, 1) the number of the halachically Jewish messianics is rapidly dwindling; their population, especially leadership, is aging and is not technically savvy. The older Jewish messianics have not replaced themselves due to wholesale assimilation and intermarriage – they are the last in their families to be Jewish, 2) many if not most of the younger “Jewish messianics”, almost all of the current younger leadership, are not Jewish halachically, since many of them were born to Gentile mothers, 3) the “messianic movement”, in its many expressions, has already become just another Christian “Hebrew roots” denomination. In line with that, it also appears that “mainstream” messianics (e.g. Mark Kinzer) are now taking steps to grow closer to the Catholic Church and mainline Protestant churches, seeking unity and reconciliation with their “brothers in messiah”.

Christianity, the religion of replacement

April 21, 2015

realityChristianity had sought to replace just about everything that Israel held dear:

  • It replaced the One G-d of Israel with a three-headed god heretofore unknown to the Jewish people (but not so unknown to ancient pagans), violating the Oneness of G-d that permeates the Hebrew Bible from cover to cover.
  • Christianity sought to replace the Torah of G-d with Paul’s “law of Christ” (1 Corinthians 9:21), a law of a dead human being (a fuzzy “law” which NT fails to even define). At the same time, the Torah of G-d was spurned as an outmoded “schoolmaster” (Galatians 3:24) who, while once necessary, had outlived his usefulness. Even the so called “Torah-observant messianic Jews” do not observe Torah but rather put on a thin veneer of Jewishness, with ample lip service to how wonderful Torah is and how it’s still applicable. They believe, again via Paul, that the promised negative consequences for non-observance (a.k.a. the “curses”) were supposedly nullified by Jesus on the cross (but still very much applicable to Jews who don’t believe in Jesus). But hey, the Law is a nice “guide”, if one is into it (and especially if used as a “witness to lost Jewish people”). Do messianics observe Torah? In my experience, even the most observant of them, their “rabbis” and “scholars”, do not truly observe such basics as either laws of kashrut or Shabbat, but do whatever feels right to them (I know, since I was once myself an MJ and have seen the levels of observance of my former coreligionists first hand). Most Jewish-born messianics, even rabbis, are married to non-Jews and do not hesitate to officiate marriage ceremonies for those who are born Jewish with Gentile Christians.

Read more…

Christian anti-Judaism and the road to Auschwitz

April 16, 2015

Today is Holocaust Remembrance Day (Yom HaShoah). Let’s not forget how we got there.

auschwitzEusebius [famed Christian polemicist, Church historian, and bishop of Caesarea] will use [anti-Judaism] as a launching pad of his history of the Church, contrasting the triumph of the Church with the calamities that befell the Jews in “punishment” for their treatment of Jesus. Athanasius [Church Father, chief defender of Trinitarianism against Arianism] will use it to show that the Arians [a “heretical” non-trinitarian Christian movement that held that Jesus was a created being] are “no better” than the Jews. For Augustine [Christian theologian and philosopher who greatly influenced Western Christian thought], one of the “real” errors of the Pelagian vision will consist in the “Jewishness” of Pelagianism [belief that original sin did not taint human nature and that mortal will is still capable of choosing good or evil without special Divine aid], and the Pelagianism of the Jews. The synod of Elvira [ecclesiastical synod of 305 CE that imposed all manner of legal disabilities on Jews, prefiguring Nazi laws centuries later] will legislate against the Jews as non-Christians. And Ambrose [bishop of Milan, one of the most influential Christian figures of the 4th century] will prohibit the rebuilding of a burned synagogue, because the Jews have no rights; they will have become not only non-Christians, but almost non-persons. The road from here to Auschwitz is long and may not be direct, but one can get there from here. (Efroymson, “Tertullian’s Anti-Judaism”)

Article: Numbers vs. Truth

April 13, 2015

worshipping-jcBy Moshe Ben-Chaim

In the world of philosophy, the truth is eternal: what was true, will always be true. This is because reality is determined by G-d, Who knows all events that have happened, and will come to be. G-d’s truth is not subject to variation. No “new “ considerations come before G-d, the Knower of all times. Even as our times change, G-d’s knowledge has already seen the end of time, and nonetheless, He formulated a Torah with precise rules and laws. Hence, there can be only one truth that G-d possesses, and one truth, which He handed to mankind. We have discussed this many times: Revelation at Sinai was the only event in all of history where masses witnessed G-d’s revelation. No other religion makes this claim, and just the opposite is true: other religions incorporate our Torah – a testament to our Torah’s absolute truth. (But we do not depend on their confirmation to validate Torah.)

Read more…

Would the disciples of Jesus die for a lie?

April 7, 2015

Christian-MartyrsWould someone die for a lie? Would someone willingly give up their life on account of falsehood? Would an act of martyrdom prove the veracity of a religious claim? A common Christian apologetic goes something like this: the apostles and the first Christians died for their belief in Jesus and his resurrection. This proves that Christianity was based on truth, since no one, the proponents of this argument insist, would be willing to die for what they know to be a lie. Is such reasoning sound?

Let us first consider the following:

Read more…